Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Clement Chidekh vs Loic Namigandet Tenguere Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Chidekh vs Tenguere analysis and find out who is favored!
Clement Chidekh vs Loic Namigandet Tenguere Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Chidekh 1 - 0 Tenguere
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Chidekh has won 50.95% of points on their second serve, while Tenguere has won 51.09%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Chidekh, in recent form, has won 56.88% of their opponent's second serve points, while Tenguere has won 46.52%. The same stats for first serve returns are 35% and 31.66% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Chidekh has saved 59.48% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Tenguere has saved 72.73% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Chidekh has won 68.75% of matches played (W/L 44/ 20), with Tenguere winning 58.33% (W/L 28/ 20) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Chidekh has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 71% (W/L 60/ 24), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 7/ 7). Tenguere has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 64% (W/L 18/ 10), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 37% (W/L 7/ 12).
- Player level: In the last year, Chidekh has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 71.43% of matches (W/L 25/ 10), where as Tenguere has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 58.33% of matches (W/L 28/ 20). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Chidekh winning 1 times and Tenguere being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Chidekh winning 2 and Tenguere winning 0. The last match between Chidekh and Tenguere was at the M25 Esch/Alzette, 02-01-2024, First, I.hard with Clement Chidekh getting the victory 7-6(1) 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:48:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Chidekh and Tenguere have played a deciding set 0 times, with Chidekh winning 0 times and Tenguere 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Chidekh winning 1, and Tenguere 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Chidekh has played against opponents with an average rank of 282.11 while Tenguere has played against players with an average rank of 56.88.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Chidekh has won 77% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Tenguere has won 45% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Chidekh has converted 50.14% of breakpoint opportunities, and Tenguere has converted 48% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
280
Rank
265
High
22
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
25
Age
Plays
L
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
Form
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
68% (117-54)
Career Total W/L
54% (28-24)
74% (34-12)
YTD W/L
50% (10-10)
$6,035
Career Prize Money
$0
3
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Clement Chidekh | Loic Namigandet Tenguere |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 9 |
| Aces (Total) | 5 | 6 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 7 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:48:0 | 1:48:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 52% (34/65) | 51% (36/71) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 82% (28/34) | 78% (28/36) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 58% (18/31) | 40% (14/35) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 40% (2/5) | 33% (1/3) |
| Return Points W% | 41% (29/71) | 29% (19/65) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(1) 6-3 |
Stats 
Clement Chidekh
Player
Loic Namigandet Tenguere
52%
(
34 of
65)
1st Serve %
51%
(
36 of
71)
5
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
7
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
28 of
36)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
19 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
29 of
71)
75
Total Points Won
61
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Clement Chidekh | Loic Namigandet Tenguere |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 74% (34/12) | 50% (10/10) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 65% (70/38) | 57% (25/19) |
| Games Win/Loss | 55% (546/439) | 53% (258/226) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 40% (2/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 54% (7/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 82% (27/6) | 53% (8/7) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.22 | 0.49 |
| Aces Total | 105 | 117 |
| DFs per game | 0.28 | 0.3 |
| DFs Total | 136 | 71 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:41:1 | 1:34:57 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 289.67 | 26.55 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (1898/3111) | 59% (755/1277) |
| 1st Serve W% | 68% (1291/1898) | 75% (569/755) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 51% (618/1213) | 51% (264/522) |
| BPs Won% Total | 50% (179/357) | 47% (44/93) |
| Return Pts W% | 44% (1390/3181) | 36% (424/1167) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 78% (18/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 76% (16/5) | 50% (10/10) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 73% (33/45) | 53% (10/19) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 40% (4/10) | 22% (2/9) |
| Deciding Set W% | 82% (14/17) | 17% (1/6) |
| 1st set W, W | 97% (29/28) | 83% (12/10) |
| 1st set W, L | 3% (29/1) | 17% (12/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 35% (17/6) | 0% (7/0) |
Clement Chidekh Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Clement Chidekh
41%
(
17 of
41)
1st Serve %
69%
(
33 of
48)
5
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
76%
(
13 of
17)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
12 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
56
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Marco Cecchinato
Player
Clement Chidekh
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve %
71%
(
42 of
59)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Clement Chidekh
Player
Anas Bennour Dit Sahli
54%
(
43 of
79)
1st Serve %
43%
(
30 of
69)
0
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
14
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
11 of
39)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
39%
(
31 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
39 of
69)
87
Total Points Won
61
|
6-0 5-7 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Toby Alex Kodat
Player
Clement Chidekh
51%
(
40 of
79)
1st Serve %
52%
(
38 of
73)
4
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
7
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
46%
(
18 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
42%
(
33 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
37 of
73)
83
Total Points Won
69
|
6-2 2-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Clement Chidekh
Player
Martin Damm
56%
(
61 of
109)
1st Serve %
53%
(
49 of
92)
5
Aces
9
9
Double Faults
8
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
36 of
49)
48%
(
23 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
39%
(
43 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
37 of
92)
103
Total Points Won
98
|
6-4 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Clement Chidekh
Player
Robert Strombachs
47%
(
26 of
55)
1st Serve %
58%
(
28 of
48)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
54%
(
14 of
26)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
40%
(
22 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
44
|
0-6 6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Clement Chidekh
Player
Tomasz Berkieta
45%
(
22 of
49)
1st Serve %
54%
(
26 of
48)
0
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
4
73%
(
16 of
22)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
17 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
56
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Facundo Bagnis
Player
Clement Chidekh
60%
(
41 of
68)
1st Serve %
62%
(
44 of
71)
5
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
22 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
29 of
71)
75
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Fausto Tabacco
Player
Clement Chidekh
59%
(
41 of
70)
1st Serve %
76%
(
50 of
66)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
6
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
28 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
66)
76
Total Points Won
60
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Gabriele Piraino
Player
Clement Chidekh
63%
(
59 of
94)
1st Serve %
54%
(
47 of
87)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
7
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
43%
(
15 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
40)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
86%
(
6 of
7)
46%
(
43 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
40 of
87)
91
Total Points Won
90
|
7-6(3) 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Loic Namigandet Tenguere Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
William Jansen
Player
Loic Namigandet Tenguere
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve %
57%
(
55 of
96)
1
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
7
83%
(
35 of
42)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
37 of
55)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
14 of
41)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
16 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
45 of
96)
91
Total Points Won
67
|
4-6 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Andrea Paolini
Player
Loic Namigandet Tenguere
81%
(
54 of
67)
1st Serve %
58%
(
42 of
72)
0
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
6
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
30%
(
20 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
28 of
72)
75
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Loic Namigandet Tenguere
Player
Darrshan Suresh
55%
(
34 of
62)
1st Serve %
62%
(
34 of
55)
6
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
31%
(
19 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
55)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Marcus Walters
Player
Loic Namigandet Tenguere
72%
(
47 of
65)
1st Serve %
75%
(
50 of
67)
2
Aces
3
-
Double Faults
-
79%
(
37 of
47)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
35 of
50)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
71%
(
12 of
17)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
15 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
20 of
67)
70
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Loic Namigandet Tenguere
Player
Freddie Ridout
62%
(
38 of
61)
1st Serve %
57%
(
33 of
58)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
18 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
23 of
58)
66
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jannik Opitz
Player
Loic Namigandet Tenguere
61%
(
47 of
77)
1st Serve %
69%
(
73 of
106)
4
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
83%
(
39 of
47)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
48 of
73)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
6%
(
1 of
16)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
32%
(
25 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
41 of
106)
93
Total Points Won
90
|
3-6 7-6(3) 10-8 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Loic Namigandet Tenguere
Player
Arsene Pougault
55%
(
38 of
69)
1st Serve %
62%
(
32 of
52)
10
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
89%
(
34 of
38)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
32%
(
10 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
25 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
22 of
52)
66
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Robin Bertrand
Player
Loic Namigandet Tenguere
71%
(
41 of
58)
1st Serve %
58%
(
42 of
72)
3
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
3
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
16 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
30 of
72)
72
Total Points Won
58
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Loic Namigandet Tenguere
Player
Olaf Pieczkowski
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve %
69%
(
44 of
64)
7
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
31 of
44)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
14 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
25 of
64)
71
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Loic Namigandet Tenguere
Player
Janos Fekete
54%
(
25 of
46)
1st Serve %
70%
(
31 of
44)
6
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
12 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
58
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Chidekh Vs Tenguere Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
